Match statistics snapshot
- Lamia fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Lamia was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 50%).
- Volos NFC held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.