Match statistics snapshot
- Volos NFC fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- OFI was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
- Volos NFC held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead |
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 468Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 555Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | Fouls | 19Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |