Match statistics snapshot
- Volos NFC created the clearer chances on xG (2.46 vs 0.77, Δ 1.69).
- Volos NFC fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Volos NFC was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 2.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 232 | Accurate passes | 302Lead |
| 316 | Total passes | 390Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.20 | Goals prevented | 1.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Ofi |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |