Match statistics snapshot
- Panetolikos fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Volos NFC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Panetolikos |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Panetolikos |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 266Lead |
| 350Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Panetolikos |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Panetolikos |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Volos Nfc | Statistic | Panetolikos |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 20Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |