Match statistics snapshot
- Volta Redonda created the clearer chances on xG (2.33 vs 1.36, Δ 0.97).
- Volta Redonda fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- CFRJ / Maricá was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Volta Redonda | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 2.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Volta Redonda | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 464Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 207 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Volta Redonda | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Volta Redonda | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Volta Redonda | Statistic | Cfrj / Maricá |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 8 |
Statistics is not available yet.