Match statistics snapshot
- Kooteepee fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- VPS was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vps | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vps | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vps | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vps | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vps | Statistic | Kooteepee |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |