Match statistics snapshot
- VPS fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Lahti was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vps | Statistic | Lahti |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vps | Statistic | Lahti |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vps | Statistic | Lahti |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vps | Statistic | Lahti |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vps | Statistic | Lahti |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |