Match statistics snapshot
- Waalwijk created the clearer chances on xG (1.82 vs 1.39, Δ 0.43).
- AZ Alkmaar fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Waalwijk was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 1.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.39 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 400Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.