Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 0.75, Δ 0.09).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Heerenveen was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 466Lead |
| 349 | Total passes | 556Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |