Match statistics snapshot
- Waalwijk created the clearer chances on xG (2.49 vs 0.98, Δ 1.51).
- Waalwijk fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 2.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 269 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 6 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.