Match statistics snapshot
- Waalwijk created the clearer chances on xG (2.59 vs 1.43, Δ 1.16).
- Waalwijk fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Waalwijk was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 2.59Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 419Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 504Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 2.46 | Goals prevented | 2.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.