Match statistics snapshot
- Waalwijk created the clearer chances on xG (2.99 vs 1.73, Δ 1.26).
- Vitesse fired more attempts (19 vs 17 shots).
- Waalwijk was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 2.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.73 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 266 | Accurate passes | 389Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 485Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Blocked shots | 8 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waalwijk | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.