Match statistics snapshot
- Barnet created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 2.08, Δ 0.86).
- Barnet fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Barnet was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.08Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | Ball possession | 75%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 682Lead |
| 249 | Total passes | 778Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |