Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 0.54, Δ 0.31).
- Walsall fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Walsall was more accurate in front of goal (10% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 53% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 160 | Accurate passes | 289Lead |
| 300 | Total passes | 426Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.