Match statistics snapshot
- Cheltenham created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 2.21, Δ 1.00).
- Cheltenham fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Cheltenham was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.21Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 323 | Accurate passes | 521Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.