Match statistics snapshot
- Crawley Town created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.55, Δ 1.03).
- Crawley Town fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Crawley Town was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 130 | Accurate passes | 330Lead |
| 216 | Total passes | 411Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 12Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.