Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Walsall was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 62%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 186Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 301 | Total passes | 311Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |