Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Walsall was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 36%).
- Gillingham held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 291 | Total passes | 577Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |