Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 66%Lead |
| 183 | Accurate passes | 223Lead |
| 306 | Total passes | 339Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |