Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Salford City was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 25%).
- Walsall held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Walsall | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Walsall | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 59%Lead | Pass accuracy | 53% |
| 194Lead | Accurate passes | 131 |
| 328Lead | Total passes | 246 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Walsall | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Walsall | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Walsall | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |