Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Shamrock Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 20%).
- Waterford held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 66%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 200Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 301Lead | Total passes | 236 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.