Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Shamrock Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 30%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 537Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.