Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Shamrock Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 390 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.