Match statistics snapshot
- Shamrock Rovers fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Waterford was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 17%).
- Shamrock Rovers held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 160 | Accurate passes | 610Lead |
| 242 | Total passes | 686Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shamrock Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.