Match statistics snapshot
- Waterford was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 320Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 415Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.