Match statistics snapshot
- Waterford fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 332Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 431Lead | Total passes | 400 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.