Match statistics snapshot
- Shelbourne fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Shelbourne was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 8%).
- Shelbourne held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 569Lead |
| 341 | Total passes | 655Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.