Match statistics snapshot
- Waterford created the clearer chances on xG (3.12 vs 0.40, Δ 2.72).
- Waterford fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Waterford was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Waterford | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 3.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Waterford | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 385Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Waterford | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Waterford | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.79 | Goals prevented | -0.79 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Waterford | Statistic | Sligo Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.