Match statistics snapshot
- Werder Bremen created the clearer chances on xG (2.70 vs 1.36, Δ 1.34).
- Werder Bremen fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Werder Bremen was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Werder Bremen | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Werder Bremen | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 314 | Accurate passes | 336Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 424Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Werder Bremen | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Werder Bremen | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.92 | Goals prevented | -0.92 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Werder Bremen | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.