Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 1.15, Δ 0.14).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 597Lead |
| 247 | Total passes | 660Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |