Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (3.79 vs 0.65, Δ 3.14).
- West Ham fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- West Ham was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 3.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.65 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 361 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 430 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |