Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 1.69, Δ 0.11).
- West Ham fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.69 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 356 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 438 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |