Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.96, Δ 0.83).
- West Ham fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.96Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 256 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.