Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.38, Δ 0.43).
- West Ham fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 337Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 418Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.63 | Goals prevented | -0.63 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |