Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.66, Δ 0.47).
- Wolves fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- West Ham was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 456Lead |
| 433 | Total passes | 541Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |