Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (2.35 vs 0.59, Δ 1.76).
- West Ham fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- West Ham was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 393Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 456Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.55 | Goals prevented | -0.55 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| West Ham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |