Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Admira Wacker was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 45%).
- Wolfsberger AC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Admira Wacker |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Admira Wacker |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 293Lead | Accurate passes | 242 |
| 421Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Admira Wacker |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Admira Wacker |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Admira Wacker |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.