Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
- Grazer AK held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 345Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 439Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.