Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 0.60, Δ 0.02).
- Grazer AK fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 200 | Accurate passes | 262Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 360Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |