Match statistics snapshot
- Ried fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 276Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 372 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |