Match statistics snapshot
- Ried fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 267Lead | Accurate passes | 259 |
| 370Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.