Match statistics snapshot
- Ried created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 1.35, Δ 0.42).
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Ried was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 291 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.36 | Goals prevented | 0.36 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |