Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 33%).
- Wolfsberger AC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 526Lead | Total passes | 378 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |