Match statistics snapshot
- WSG Wattens created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 2.15, Δ 1.36).
- WSG Wattens fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.15Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.