Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 0.39, Δ 0.70).
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- WSG Wattens was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.39 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 406Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.97 | Goals prevented | -0.97 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolfsberger Ac | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |