Match statistics snapshot
- Brighton created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 2.22, Δ 0.08).
- Brighton was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
- Brighton held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.22Lead |
| 4Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 389 | Accurate passes | 486Lead |
| 462 | Total passes | 552Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.