Match statistics snapshot
- Burnley created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 0.87, Δ 0.04).
- Burnley fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 370Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 436 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |