Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (2.28 vs 1.43, Δ 0.85).
- Wolves fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Burnley was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 2.28Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 308 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.30 | Goals prevented | 0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |