Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (0.55 vs 1.13, Δ 0.58).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.13Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |