Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 2.06, Δ 0.79).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 176 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 266 | Total passes | 600Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |